Medical Device CRO Blog

Gamification: Can it Help Engage Subjects in Clinical Trials?

Posted by Emily Haglund on Thu, Feb 26, 2015

Gamification is defined as “the process of turning an activity or task into a game or something resembling a game.” This concept has been leveraged in the fields of education and marketing to create engagement with a topic or product by using game playing techniques such as point scoring, achievement badges, or virtual currency.

Read More

Topics: Gamification, Games, Clinical Research

Update on Strategic Priorities for CDRH

Posted by Emily Haglund on Mon, Feb 23, 2015

The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) recently released an update on its 2014-2015 Strategic Priorities. This document summarizes the areas that CDRH is focusing on to ensure patients in the US have access to high-quality, safe, and effective medical devices. The current strategic priorities are: to strengthen the clinical trial enterprise, to strike the right balance between premarket and postmarket data collection, and to provide excellent customer service.

Read More

Topics: Medical Devices, Strategic Priorities, CDRH

FDA Kefauver-Harris Amendment (1962)

Posted by Shawn Kennedy on Fri, Feb 20, 2015

You may be familiar with IMARC Research’s History of Clinical Research (HCR). We recently  released an eBook about it that briefly describes all of the images that currently make up the timeline. If you have visited our office, you may have also been given a guided tour of one of our most renowned resources. Due to the overwhelmingly positive feedback we have received, we will be highlighting each time point with a series of blogs that we plan to release over the course of the 2014-2015 calendar year.

Read More

Topics: History of Clinical Research, Kefauver-Harris Amendment, IMARC Research, FDA

Why We’re Launching IMARC University: A Message From Our CEO

Posted by John Lehmann on Wed, Feb 18, 2015

It has always been my goal to make clinical research education more widely available to professionals, raising standards across the industry. This vision was the foundation for IMARC more than 16 years ago, and now, we’re taking another major step toward realizing that vision. Starting today, clinical research professionals will have easier access to affordable training through IMARC University, our new series of online training courses.

Read More

Topics: Sandra Maddock, Training, IMARC University, Clinical Research Professionals

Risk Management in Clinical Research

Posted by John Lehmann on Mon, Feb 16, 2015

Please take time to review Emily Haglund’s article “Risk Management in Clinical Research Process and Application” that was recently posted on GxP Lifeline.  The applicable guidances for good clinical practice (GCP), ICH E6 and ISO14155, state explicitly that the sponsor is responsible for quality assurance and quality control. One aspect of quality involves how risks are approached and managed throughout the course of a clinical trial, and is the focus of this article.

Read More

Topics: Risk Management, Emily Haglund, GxP Lifeline, Clinical Research

A Question of Disclosure: FDA Findings and Publications

Posted by Lori Karpinecz on Thu, Feb 12, 2015

When the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) identifies significant findings with the conduct of a clinical trial during an inspection, what happens to those findings? According to a recent article published online by JAMA Internal Medicine, those findings remain hidden in plain sight.

Read More

Topics: Inspections, Charles Selfe, FDA, Warning Letters

5 Questions for Coordinators Preparing for a Monitoring Visit

Posted by Brandy Chittester on Tue, Feb 10, 2015

As monitors, we spend a decent amount of time preparing for the visit – before we even head out the door. On the road, we’ve noticed that the most effective coordinators tend to be those who also prepare for the visit. Spending an extra hour or two before the visit can decrease the amount of queries, follow-up items and even the length of the visit itself. Before your next monitoring visit, consider asking yourself these five questions:

Read More

Topics: Coordinators, Regulatory Binder, Clinical Monitoring

Centralization of IRBs – What Should Be Considered For Your Study?

Posted by Emily Haglund on Thu, Feb 05, 2015

There has been a recent trend in clinical research toward the use of central Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) or Ethics Committees (ECs) for multi-center trials. 21 CFR Part 56.114 outlines the following on cooperative research:

Read More

Topics: NIH, Centralization of IRBs, FDA

Case Study – Applying the FAIR Shake™

Posted by Stephani Hulec on Tue, Feb 03, 2015

Since the suicide death of Dan Markingson in May of 2004, there has been a lot of debate as to whether or not the 26 year old psychiatric patient should have been approached to consent to participate in a clinical research trial for the comparison of three atypical antipsychotic drugs. Recently, there has been an article published in the Minnesota Daily about a petition signed by over 3,000 ethicists, researchers and scholars asking the University of Minnesota’s President to review the case to prevent future tragedies at the institution. Such a petition was created due to several errors in processes related to human subject protection.

Read More

Topics: FAIR Shake, University of Minnesota, Dan Markingson, IMARC Research

CDRH Sets Performance Goals

Posted by John Lehmann on Thu, Jan 29, 2015

The FDA’s device center (CDRH) has established time based performance standards to help ensure draft guidance documents do not remain in an unresolved state for too long.  The following draft performance goals have been outlined:

Read More

Topics: FDA, CDRH, Performance Goals, Draft Guidances, Bradley Merrill Thompson