<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=213807269037206&ev=PageView&noscript=1">
Blog

Compliance In Focus

remote services

LEARN MORE ABOUT REMOTE SERVICES

Keep Your Clinical Trial Moving from a Distance

You want to keep your trial on track, but physical distancing and travel restrictions have made it difficult. Fortunately, IMARC has experience providing remote services.

FILTER BY:

Newest Post

Posted by John Lehmann on Fri, Apr 08, 2016

Significant Risk vs. Non-Significant Risk Determination

Dr. Harvey Arbit of Arbit Consulting has penned a whitepaper for IMARC Research titled, “Significant Risk/Non-Significant Risk Determination and IDE Applicability.”  Although the Medical Device Amendments were enacted on May 28, 1976, it still seems that after all these years there is confusion and misunderstanding regarding the process for determining if an investigational device is Significant Risk (SR) or Non-Significant Risk (NSR).

Topics: Dr. Harvey Arbit, Signficant Risk, Non-Signficant Risk, FDA

Posted by Brandy Chittester on Wed, Mar 04, 2015

Significant Risk/Non-Significant Risk Determination

Dr. Harvey Arbit of Arbit Consulting has penned a whitepaper for IMARC Research titled, “Significant Risk/Non-Significant Risk Determination and IDE Applicability.”  Although the Medical Device Amendments were enacted on May 28, 1976, it still seems that after all these years there is confusion and misunderstanding regarding the process for determining if an investigational device is Significant Risk (SR) or Non-Significant Risk (NSR).

Topics: Dr. Harvey Arbit, Significant Risk, Non-Significant Risk, Investigation Device

Posted by John Lehmann on Mon, Nov 06, 2017

Significant Risk/Non-Significant Risk Determination

Dr. Harvey Arbit of Arbit Consulting has penned a whitepaper for IMARC Research titled, “Significant Risk/Non-Significant Risk Determination and IDE Applicability.”  Although the Medical Device Amendments were enacted on May 28, 1976, it still seems that after all these years there is confusion and misunderstanding regarding the process for determining if an investigational device is Significant Risk (SR) or Non-Significant Risk (NSR).

Topics: Dr. Harvey Arbit, Significant Risk, Non-Significant Risk, IMARC Research Whitepaper

Posted by John Lehmann on Wed, Mar 04, 2015

Significant Risk/Non-Significant Risk Determination Whitepaper

Dr. Harvey Arbit of Arbit Consulting has penned a whitepaper for IMARC Research titled, “Significant Risk/Non-Significant Risk Determination and IDE Applicability.”  Although the Medical Device Amendments were enacted on May 28, 1976, it still seems that after all these years there is confusion and misunderstanding regarding the process for determining if an investigational device is Significant Risk (SR) or Non-Significant Risk (NSR).

Topics: Dr. Harvey Arbit, Signficant Risk, Non-Signficant Risk, IMARC Research Whitepaper